<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Probably The Best Optical Illusion Ever [Pic]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boredpanda.com/probably-the-best-optical-illusion-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boredpanda.com/probably-the-best-optical-illusion-ever/</link>
	<description>the only magazine for Pandas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:45:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreakSmack</title>
		<link>http://www.boredpanda.com/probably-the-best-optical-illusion-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-9548</link>
		<dc:creator>FreakSmack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 04:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boredpanda.com/?p=1355#comment-9548</guid>
		<description>Wow, without the pic of the airbrushing I never would have guessed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, without the pic of the airbrushing I never would have guessed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ynkdns</title>
		<link>http://www.boredpanda.com/probably-the-best-optical-illusion-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-9517</link>
		<dc:creator>ynkdns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 18:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boredpanda.com/?p=1355#comment-9517</guid>
		<description>well if ya look closely at the pink nose, you can see a mans private part! this I think was done intentionaly too but I&#039;m sure he&#039;ll deny it. after all if you can use naked women why would you leave that out. two for one....HELLO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well if ya look closely at the pink nose, you can see a mans private part! this I think was done intentionaly too but I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;ll deny it. after all if you can use naked women why would you leave that out. two for one&#8230;.HELLO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eiro</title>
		<link>http://www.boredpanda.com/probably-the-best-optical-illusion-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-9063</link>
		<dc:creator>Eiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boredpanda.com/?p=1355#comment-9063</guid>
		<description>Althought good....but i kinda already saw it a bit.

the nose is weird and you could see that someone was bending their knees.
The white one looks photshopped touched.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Althought good&#8230;.but i kinda already saw it a bit.</p>
<p>the nose is weird and you could see that someone was bending their knees.<br />
The white one looks photshopped touched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

