Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

BoredPanda Add post form topAdd Post Search
Tooltip close

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

South Dakota Spends $450k On An Antidrug Campaign Which Says That Everyone In The State Is On Meth
User submission
1.6K
45.1K

South Dakota Spends $450k On An Antidrug Campaign Which Says That Everyone In The State Is On Meth

ADVERTISEMENT

Making a powerful and memorable PSA campaign is a hefty task. But is it really that hard not to make it sound like everyone in your state is high on meth? We are looking at you, South Dakota. Apparently, the state recently launched a campaign that aims to raise awareness of the meth epidemic, however, many people interpreted the campaign’s tagline “Meth. We are on it” as claiming that everyone in South Dakota is doing methamphetamine.

More info: Facebook | onmeth.com | youtube.com

Recently South Dakota started trending on the internet for releasing an eyebrow-raising antidrug campaign

Image credits: methchangeseverything

Image credits: onmeth

The campaign was launched as Governor Kristi Noem’s initiative to battle the methamphetamine crisis in the state. However, soon after the campaign was launched, she had to start explaining the real message of the ads.

Image credits: onmeth

According to Noem, they decided to make this PSA a bit different. Instead of condemning the drug addiction, they aimed to bring the community together by encouraging people to help those who struggle with drug abuse.

Image credits: onmeth

So, the tagline “Meth. We are on it” means ‘we are on the case of meth’ rather than ‘we’re all doing it’.

ADVERTISEMENT

The reactions to the campaign varied, with some finding the tagline hilarious to others saying it’s outright horrible. It doesn’t help that the campaign was ridiculously expensive. According to Argus Leader, it cost a staggering amount of $449,000.

Here’s how people reacted

Image credits: MikeBeauvais

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: bfizzlere

Image credits: jgumbel

Image credits: Tim790KABC

Image credits: blackhillslvr

Image credits: edabny62

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: BoozyBadger

Image credits: ShipLives

Image credits: c0mic_sans

Image credits: Rittersauce21

Image credits: ballervol79

Image credits: ColombianRaven

Image credits: Spice_Gurl21

Image credits: dawashington

ADVERTISEMENT

45Kviews

Share on Facebook
You May Like
Popular on Bored Panda
Share your thoughts
Add photo comments
POST
abigailstrain avatar
Abby Not Normal
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I thought it was ridiculous at first, but once I read about it (which ad led me to do), I really like the sentiment of the epidemic being everyone's issue and the destigmatizing nature of the ad.

siobhanac_c_ avatar
Ana B.
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I completely agree, HOWEVER the amount of money they spent on it is staggering.

Load More Replies...
shireen_2 avatar
Shireen
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It's a bad use of phrasing, I didn't even read the post or watch the video but even I can assume it's supposed to be something like "Meth? We're on the case", not "we're all on Meth".

lyndaannegutierrez avatar
Lynda Momalo
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

No, it's an excellent use of phrasing -- it's far more eye-catching and attention-catching this way and it does express the truth that a whole lot of South Dakotans (maybe a lot of people they never suspected) ARE on it -- plus there's the wordplay double meaning that indicates that the government is aware of the problem and is taking care of it. It's too bad that people are missing the point.

Load More Replies...
elizabethmacharia avatar
Elizabeth Macharia
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

What are people going on about🤷🏾‍♀️.The point is so poignantly, albeit, creatively clear, its an epidemic, ergo *we are all on it*

Load More Comments
abigailstrain avatar
Abby Not Normal
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I thought it was ridiculous at first, but once I read about it (which ad led me to do), I really like the sentiment of the epidemic being everyone's issue and the destigmatizing nature of the ad.

siobhanac_c_ avatar
Ana B.
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I completely agree, HOWEVER the amount of money they spent on it is staggering.

Load More Replies...
shireen_2 avatar
Shireen
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It's a bad use of phrasing, I didn't even read the post or watch the video but even I can assume it's supposed to be something like "Meth? We're on the case", not "we're all on Meth".

lyndaannegutierrez avatar
Lynda Momalo
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

No, it's an excellent use of phrasing -- it's far more eye-catching and attention-catching this way and it does express the truth that a whole lot of South Dakotans (maybe a lot of people they never suspected) ARE on it -- plus there's the wordplay double meaning that indicates that the government is aware of the problem and is taking care of it. It's too bad that people are missing the point.

Load More Replies...
elizabethmacharia avatar
Elizabeth Macharia
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

What are people going on about🤷🏾‍♀️.The point is so poignantly, albeit, creatively clear, its an epidemic, ergo *we are all on it*

Load More Comments
Popular on Bored Panda
Trending on Bored Panda
Also on Bored Panda